Abordari si studii de caz relevante privind managementul organizatiilor din Romania in contextul pandemiei COVID – 19

35,00 lei


In mod firesc, cel de-al doilea volum de studii de caz relevante privind managementul din Romania realizat sub egida SAMRO este puternic si multiplu influentat de pandemia Covid-19 si de complexele sale consecinte polidimensionale.


  1. Aga, D.A., Noorderhaven, N., Vallejo, B., Transformational leadership and project success: The mediating role of team-building, International Journal of Project Management, 34(5), p. 806-818, 2016.
  2. Avolio, B.J., Gardner, W.L., Authentic leadership development: Getting to the root of positive forms of leadership, Leadership Quarterly, 16(3), p. 315-338, 2005.
  3. Avolio, B.J., Walumba, F.O., Weber, T.J., Leadership: Current Theories, Research, and Future Directions, Annual Review of Psychology, 60, p. 421-449, 2009.
  4. Balaure V. (coordonator), Marketing, Editia a II-a, Editura Uranus, Bucuresti, 2003.
  5. Balducci, C., Fraccaroli, F., Schaufeli, W.B.,Psychometric properties of the Italian version of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES-9): A cross-cultural analysis, European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 26, (2), 2010, 143-149;Beavers, A. S., Lounsbury, J. W., Richards, J. K., Huck, S. W., Skolits, G J., Esquivel, S. L. (2013): Practical considerations for using exploratory factor analysis in educational research. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation, 18(6), 1-13.
  6. Berezovskaya, R.A., Motivational determinants of work engagement among physicians, Petersburg Psychological Journal, 4, 2013, 30-43.
  7. Berman, S., Korsten, P., & Marshall, A., (2016), Digital reinvention in action: what to do and how to make it happen. IBM.
  8. Bert van der Zwaan., Higher Education in 2040- A global approach, Amsterdam University Press, 2017, disponibil la https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/handle/20.500. 12657/31675/625978.pdf? sequence=1
  9. Blake, R., Mouton, J., The Managerial Grid: The Key to the Leadership Excellence, Gulf Publishing, Houston, 1964.
  10. Bratianu C., Iordache Platis M., Prelipcean G., The Role of Legislation and Organizational Culture in Shaping Academic Leadership, Proceedings of the 12th European Conference On Management, Leadership And Governance (ECMLG 2016), p. 17-23, Bucuresti, 2016.
  11. Brown, M.E., Trevino, L.K., Harrison, D.A., Ethical leadership: A social learning perspective for construct development and testing, Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, 97(2), p. 117-134, 2005.
  12. Bryce, C., Ring, P., Ashby S., Wardman, J. K. (2020) Resilience in the face of uncertainty: early lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic, Journal of Risk Research, pp.1-9;
  13. Cetina, I., Brandabur R., Constantinescu M., Marketingul Serviciilor. Teorie si aplicatii, EdituraUranus, Bucuresti, 2006.
  14. Chaffey D., Ellis-Chadwick Fiona, Johnston K., Mayer R., Internet Marketing – Strategy, Implementation and Practice, 3rd Edition, Prentice Hall/Financial Times, Londra, 2006.
  15. Chaffey D., Total e-mail marketing – Maximizing your results from integrated emarketing, second edition, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2007.
  16. Champoux, J.E., (2010), Oragnizational Behavior – integrating individuals, groups and organizations, Taylor & Francis e-Library;
  17. Chen, A.S.Y., Hou, Y.H., The effects of ethical leadership, voice behavior and climates for innovation on creativity: A moderated mediation examination, Leadership Quarterly, 27(1), p. 1-13, 2016.
  18. Cicea C., Marinescu C., Albu C.F., Balan D.P., Applying Bibliometric Mapping and Clustering on Research regarding Biomass related Innovation, Proceedings of the 33rd International-Business-Information-Management-Association Conference, 10-11 April, Granada, Spain, pp. 2404-2419, (2019b).
  19. Cicea C., Marinescu C., Pintilie N., Biogas-innovation map: revealing links and dynamics in the field, Proceedings of the 13th International Management Conference: Management strategies for high performance (IMC 2019), 1-2 November, Bucharest, pp. 483-492, (2019a).
  20. Cicea C., Popa I., Marinescu C., Stefan S.C., Determinants of SMEs’ performance: evidence from European countries, Economic Research-Ekonomska Istrazivanja, vol. 32, issue 1., pp. 1602-1620 (2019c).
  21. Cleland, J., Resilience or resistance: A personal response to COVID‐19, Med Education, 54, 2020, pp. 589-590.
  22. Cortes-Sanchez J.D., Mission statements of universities worldwide- Text mining and visualization. Intangible Capital, 2018, 14(4), pp. 584-603.
  23. Dessler G., (2008), Human Resource Management, 11th ed., Prentice Hall, New Jersey.
  24. Dinh J.E., Lord R.G., Gardner W.L., Meseur J.D., Liden R.C., Hu J.Y., Leadership theory and research in the new millennium: Current theoretical trends and changing perspectives, Leadership Quarterly, 25(1), p. 36-62, 2014.
  25. Dumitrascu, D.D., Miricescu D., Management – Culegere de probleme si studii de caz, Editura Universitatii „Lucian Blaga”, Sibiu, 2002.
  26. Erickson, T., (2008), Plugged in: the Generation Y guide to thriving at work. Harvard Business Press.
  27. Extremera, N., Sanchez-Garcia, M., Duran, M.A., Rey, L., Examining the Psychometric Properties of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale in Two Spanish Multi-occupational Samples, International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 20, (1), 2012, 105–110.
  28. Feldman R., Sanger J.,The Text Mining Handbook, Cambridge University Press, New York, 2007.
  29. Fong, T.C, Ho, R.T., Dimensionality of the 9-item Utrecht Work Engagement Scale revisited: A Bayesian structural equation modeling approach, Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 1, 2015, 353–358.
  30. Frondizi R., Fantauzzi C., Colasanti N., Fiorani G., The Evaluation of Universities’ Third Mission and Intellectual Capital: Theoretical Analysis and Application to Italy, Sustainability, 2019, 11, 3455.
  31. Galton, F., Hereditary Genius, Barnes & Nobles Inc., New York, 2012.
  32. Garcia, M.L., & Bray, O.H., (1997), Fundamentals of Technology Roadmapping (No. SAND—97-0665). Sandia National Labs, Albuquerque, NM (United States).
  33. Ghidul Solicitantului – Conditii Specifice Romania Start Up Plus (accesibil la: https://www.fonduri-structurale.ro/stiri/17400/pocu-a-fost-publicata-varianta-finala-a-ghidului-pentru-romania-start-up-plus)
  34. Gibb, C.A., Leadership, capitol in lucrarea Handbook of Social Psychology, Reading Massachusetts.
  35. Gorski, H., (2008), Management, Editura Universitatii „Lucian Blaga” din Sibiu, vol. 1 si 2;
  36. Graen G.B., Uhlbien, M., Relationship-based approach to leadership – development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years – applying a multilevel multidomain perspective, Leadership Quarterly, 6(2), p. 219-247, 1995.
  37. Hair, J.F., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J., Anderson, R.E., Tatham, R.L., Multivariate data analysis, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, Pearson Prentice Hall, 2006.
  38. Hallinger, P., Bringing context out of the shadows of leadership, Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 46(1), p. 5-24, 2018.
  39. Hanson A.W., Kalyanam Kirthi, Internet Marketing & e-Commerce, Thomson South-West, SUA, 2007.
  40. Hearst, M., What is text mining, Octombrie 2003, retrieved from http://people.ischool. berkeley.edu/~hearst/text-mining.html
  41. Hemphill, J.K., Situational Factors of Leadership, Ohio State University, Bureau of Educational Research, 1949.
  42. Hitt, M.A., Black, J.S., Porter, L.W., (2012), Management, 3rd Edition, Prentice Hall, Pearson Education, New Jersey, USA;
  43. House, R.J., Path-goal theory of leadership: Lessons, legacy, and a reformulated theory, Leadership Quarterly, 7(3), p. 323-352, 1971.
  44. Huntley, R., (2006), The World According to Y: Inside the New Adult Generation. Allen & Unwin.
  45. Jusge, T.A., Bono, T.E., Ilies, R., Gerhardt, M.W., Personality and leadership: A qualitative and quantitative review, Journal pf Applied Psychology, 87(4), p. 765-780, 2002.
  46. Kavadias, S., Ladas, K., and Loch, C., (2016), The Transformative Business Model. Harvard Business Review October.
  47. Keller K.L., Strategic Brand Management, 3rd Edition, Pearson Education, Pearson Prentice Hall, 2008.
  48. Kosmutzky A., Between Mission and Market Position: Empirical Findings on Mission Statements of German Higher Education Institutions, Tertiary Education and Management, 2012, 18(1), pp. 55-77.
  49. Kotler Ph., Armstrong G., Principiile marketingului, Editura Teora, Bucuresti, 2008.
  50. Kotler Ph., Managementul marketingului, Editura Teora, Bucuresti, 2008.
  51. Kulikowski, K., Do we all agree on how to measure work engagement? Factorial validity of Utrecht work engagement scale as a standard measurement tool – A literature review, International Journal of Occupational Medicine and Environmental Health, 30, 2017, 161-175.
  52. Lee, J., Davari, H., Yang, S., Bagheri, B., (2015), Industrial big data analytics and cyber-physical systems for future maintenance & service innovation. Procedia CIRP 38 (2015 ), 3-7.
  53. Li Y.W., Yang Z.F., Wang X., Chen L., Leadership behavior, economic performance and well-being, International Journal of Psychology, vol. 39, issue 5-6, 2004.
  54. Littman-Ovadia, H, Balducci C., Psychometric properties of the Hebrew version of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale, (UWES-9), European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 2013, 58-63.
  55. Lopez Y.P., Martin W., University Mission Statements and Sustainable Performance, Business and Society Review, 2018, 123(2), pp. 341-368.
  56. Machiavelli, N., The Prince, Hackett Publishing Company, 2008.
  57. Mandrikova, E., Gorbunova, A., Relationship between work engagement, personal resources, and employees’ job satisfaction, Organizational Psychology, 2(4), 2012, 2–22.
  58. Mann, R.D., A Review of the Relationships between Personality and Performance in Small Groups, Psychological Bulletin 56(4), p. 241-270, 1959.
  59. Marinescu C., Cicea C., A bibliometric analysis of the international management conference proceedings’ papers, Proceedings of the 12th International Management Conference: Management perspectives in the digital era (IMC 2018), Bucuresti, pp. 293-306, 2018.
  60. Marinescu C., Cicea C., Colesca S., Tracking biofuels-innovation relationship through scientific and technological advances, Management Research and Practice, vol. 11, issue 2, pp. 31-44, 2019.
  61. Marriott, N.G., Gravani, R.B., Principles of Food Sanitation, ed. 5, Springer Scientific: New York, USA, 2005, p. 170.
  62. Matt, C., Hess, T., & Benlian, A., (2015), Digital Transformation Strategies. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 57 (5). p. 339-343.
  63. Mettler, T., (2009), A Design Science Research Perspective on Maturity Models in Information.
  64. Mettler, T., (2011), Maturity Assessment Models: A Design Science Research Approach. International Journal of Society Systems Science, 3(1-2).
  65. Meyers, M.C., Adams, B.G., Sekaja, L., Buzea, C., Cazan, A-M., Gotea, M., Stefenel, D., van Woerkom, M., Perceived organizational support for the use of employees’ strengths and employee well‑being: A cross‑country comparison, Journal of Happiness Studies, 20(6), 2019, 1825-1841.
  66. Mihalcea, A., (2017), Employer branding and talent management in the digital age. Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy, 5(2), 289-306.
  67. Mitan, A., (2014), Digital natives coming of age: Challenges for managers. Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy, 2(2), 335-354.
  68. Negricea C.I., Strategii de marketing online –solutii de succes pentru dezvoltarea si implementarea aplicatiilor de marketing online in activitatea organizatiei, Editura Universitara, Bucuresti, 2010.
  69. Nerstad, C.G.L., Richardsen, A.M., Martinussen, M., Factorial validity of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES) across occupational groups in Norway. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 51(4), 2010, 326-333.
  70. Nicolescu O, Verboncu I., Management, Editura Economica, Bucuresti, 1999, pp. 170-180.
  71. Nicolescu O., Nicolescu C., (2008), Intreprenoriatul si managementul intreprinderilor mici si mijlocii, Editura Economica, Bucuresti.
  72. Nicolescu O., Verboncu I., Management, Editura Economica, Bucuresti, 1999, pp. 136-145.
  73. Nicolescu, O., Verboncu, I., (2008), Fundamentele managementului organizatiei, EdituraUniversitara, Bucuresti
  74. Nwaiwu, (2018), Review and comparison of conceptual frameworks on digital business transformation. Journal of Competitiveness, 10(3), 86-100.
  75. OECD and European Commission. A Guiding Framework for Entrepreneurial Universities. Paris 2012.
  76. Pamfilie, R., Petcu A.J., Draghici M., The importance of leadership in driving a strategic Lean Six Sigma management, 8th International Strategic Management Conference, vol. 58, p. 187-196, Barcelona, 2012.
  77. Paraschiv D.M., Nemoianu E.L., Langa C.A., Szabo T., Eco-Innovation, Responsible Leadership And Organizational Change For Corporate Sustainability, Amfiteatru Economic, 14(32), p. 404-419, 2012.
  78. Paunescu C., Argatu R., Lungu M., Implementarea standardului ISO 22000 in companiile romanesti: motivatii, dificultati si beneficii cheie, Amfiteatru Economic, 20 (47), 2018, pp. 31-47.
  79. Percy L., Strategic Integrated Marketing Communications, Butterworth-Heinemann, SUA, 2008.
  80. Pinzaru, F., Mihalcea, A., & Zbuchea, A., (2017), Recruiting and motivating millennials: empirical insights for managers. In Proceeding of the 11th International Management Conference „The role of management in the economic paradigm of the XXIst century, 729-737.
  81. Pinzaru, F., Vatamanescu, E.M., Mitan, A., Savulescu, R., Vitelar, A., Noaghea, C., & Balan, M., (2016), Millennials at work: Investigating the specificity of generation Y versus other generations. Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy, 4(2), 173-192
  82. Popa I., Stefa S.C., Gora A.A., The impact of leadership on motivating young generation, Proceedings of the 11th International Management Conference: The Role Of Management In The Economic Paradigm Of The XXIst Century (IMC 2017), p. 845-853, Bucuresti, 2017.
  83. Popovici A., Marghitas L.A., Antreprenoriatul in apicultura. Editura AcademicPres, Cluj-Napoca, 2013.
  84. Procedura Start-Up Nation 2018 (accesibila la: http://www.imm.gov.ro/ro/ 2019/10/01/start-up-nation-2018/)
  85. Proença, D., & Borbinha, J., (2016), Maturity models for information systems – A state of the art. Procedia Comput Science 100:1042–1049.
  86. Purcarea T., Distributie si merchandising, Editura Universitara Carol Davila, Bucuresti, 2007.
  87. Purcarea T., Inovatie si alternativa, Editura Universitatii Tehnice a Moldovei, Chisinau, 2006.
  88. Purcarea T., Ratiu M.P., Comportamentul consumatorului, o abordare de marketing, Editura Universitara „Carol Davila”, Bucuresti, 2007.
  89. Rush B., Developing HACCP Programs in Grain-Based Brewing and Food Ingredient Production Facilities, MBAA TQ, 43 (1), 2006, p. 26-30.
  90. Schaufeli, W., Bakker, A., UWES Utrecht Work Engagement Scale Preliminary Manual, Occupational Health Psychology Unit, Utrecht University, Utrecht, 2004.
  91. Schaufeli, W.B., Bakker, A.B., Salanova, M., The Measurement of Work Engagement With a Short Questionnaire: A Cross-National Study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66(4), 2006, 701–716.
  92. Schaufeli, W.B., Salanova, M., González-Romá, V., Bakker, A.B., The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach, Journal of Happiness Studies, 3, 2006, 71-92.
  93. Schmidt, R.H., Rodrick, G.E., Food Safety Handbook, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2003, p. 276–278.
  94. Schuh, G., Anderl, R., Gausemeier, J., Hompe, M.T., & Wahlster, W., (2017), Industry 4.0 Maturity Index: Managing the Digital Transformation of Companies; Acatech STUDY: Munich.
  95. Schumacher, A., Erol, S., & Sihn, W., (2016), A maturity model for assessing Industry 4.0 readiness and maturity of manufacturing enterprises. Procedia CIRP – Changeable, Agile, Reconfigurable & Virtual Production, 52 (1), 161-166.
  96. Schumacher, A., Erol, S., & Sihn, W., (2016), A maturity model for assessing Industry 4.0 readiness and maturity of manufacturing enterprises. Procedia CIRP – Changeable, Agile, Reconfigurable & Virtual Production, 52 (1), 161-166.
  97. Schumacher, A., Erol, S., & Sihn, W., (2016), A maturity model for assessing Industry 4.0 readiness and maturity of manufacturing enterprises. Procedia CIRP – Changeable, Agile, Reconfigurable & Virtual Production, 52 (1), 161-166.
  98. Schumacher, A., Nemeth, T., & Sihn, W., (2019), Roadmapping towards industrial digitalization based on an Industry 4.0 maturity model for manufacturing enterprises. Procedia CIRP 79.
  99. Schumacher, A., Nemeth, T., & Sihn, W., (2019), Roadmapping towards industrial digitalization based on an Industry 4.0 maturity model for manufacturing enterprises. Procedia CIRP 79.
  100. Shamir, B., House, R.J., Arthur, M.B., The motivational effects of charismatic leadership – a self-concept based theory, Organization Science, 4(4), p. 577-594, 1993.
  101. Shimazu, A., Schaufeli, W., Kosugi, S., Suzuki, A., Nashiwa, H., Kato, A., Sakamoto, M., Irimajiri, H., Amano, S., Hirohata, K., Goto, R. and Kitaoka‐Higashiguchi, K., Work Engagement in Japan: Validation of the Japanese Version of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale, Applied Psychology: An International Review, 57(3), 2008, 510-523;Stefenel, D., Suciu, L-C N.ew approaches toward testing occupational values in Greek higher education, in Georgescu,N., Cozma, M., Proceedings of the International Conference Challenges for Science and Research in the Crisis Era, I, Sibiu Alma Mater, Romania, 2014, 169-173.
  102. Sitnikov C., Bocean C.G., Berceanu D., Pirvu R., Model de management al riscurilor din perspectiva implementarii standardului ISO 9001:2015 in cadrul companiilor de servicii financiare, Amfiteatru Economic, 19 (11), 2017, p. 636-654.
  103. Smedescu I. (coord.), Marketing, Editura Pro Universitaria, Bucuresti, 2011.
  104. Stogdill, R.M., Personal Factors Associated with Leadership: A Survery of the Literature, The Journal of Psychology, 25(1), p. 35-71, 1948.
  105. Systems, Working Paper. Institute of Information Management, Universtiy of St. Gallen, St.Gallen.
  106. Treven, S., Mulej, M., & Lynn, M.L., (2008), The impact of culture on organizational behavior. Management :Journal of Contemporary Management Issues, 13(2), 27-39. Retrieved 11 2, 2018, https://questia.com/library/journal/1p3-1969493231/the-impact-of-culture-on-organizational-behavior
  107. Tuturea, M., Dumitrascu, D., Marginean, S., Florea, L., (2002), Management, elemente fundamentale, Editura Universitatii „Lucian Blaga” din Sibiu;
  108. Van Eck, N.J., Waltman, L., VOSViewer Manual v.1.6.8, Universiteit Leiden Publishing House, 2020, retrieved from https://www.vosviewer.com/download/f-33r2.pdf
  109. Vandenberg, R.J., Lance, C.E., A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizationalresearch, Organizational Research Methods, 3(1), 2000, 4-70.
  110. Vazquez, A.C., Magnan, E. dos S., Pacico, J.C., Hutz, C.S., Schaufeli, W.B., Adaptation and validation of the Brazilian version of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale, Psico-USF, 20, 2015, 207–217.
  111. Venkatesh, F., & Zhang, X., (2010), Unified theory of acceptance and use of technology: Us vs China. Journal of Global Information Technology Management, 13 (1), 5-27.
  112. Viljevac, A., Cooper-Thomas H.D., Saks A.M., An investigation into the validity of 2 measures of work engagement. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 2012, 23, 3692–3709.
  113. Villotti, P., Balducci C., Zaniboni S., Corbiere, M., Fraccaroli, F., An analysis of work engagement among workers with mental disorders recently integrated to work, Journal of Career Assessment, 2014, 22(1), 18–27.
  114. Virga, D., Horga, A., Iliescu, D., Work–life imbalance as a moderator in the relationship between resources and work engagement. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 14(2), 2015, 80-90.
  115. Virga, D., Zaborila, C., Sulea, C., Maricutoiu, L., Adaptarea in limba romana a Scalei Utrecht de masurare a implicarii in munca: Examinarea validitatii si a fidelitatii [Roumanian adaptation of Utrecht Work Engagement Scale: The examination of validity and reliability], Psihologia Resurselor Umane, 7(1), 2009, 58-74.
  116. Wade, M., (2015), Digital business transformation. Global Center for Digital Business Transformation.
  117. Wade, M., Noronha, A., Macauley, J, & Barbier, J., (2017), Orchestrating digital transformation. Working in concert to achieve business excellence. Global Center for Digital Business Transformation.
  118. Ward, S., The definition of leadership, The balance small business, https://www.thebalancesmb. com/leadership-definition-2948275
  119. Westerman, G., Bonnet, D., & Mc Afee, A., (2011), Digital Transformation: a Roadmap for Billion-Dollar Organizations. New York, NY: Harvard Business School Press.
  120. Westerman, G., Bonnet, D., & Mc Afee, A., (2014a), The nine elements of digital business transformation, MIT Sloan Management Review January.
  121. Westerman, G., Bonnet, D., & Mc Afee, A., (2014b), Leading Digital: turning technology into Business Transformation. New York, NY: Harvard Business School Press.
  122. Willmer, M., Westerberg, Jacobson J., Lindberg, M., Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the 9-Item Utrecht Work Engagement Scale in a Multi-Occupational Female Sample: A Cross-Sectional Study, Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 2019, 2771-2776.
  123. Witze, A., & Elizabeth Gibney, Feature Science after the pandemic, in Nature, 582, iunie 2020, p. 162-165, disponibil https://media.nature.com/original/magazine-assets/ d41586-020- 01518-y/d41586-020-01518-y.pdf
  124. Xanthopoulou, D., Bakker, A., Kantas, A., Demerouti, E., Measuring burnout and work engagement: Factor structure, invariance, and latent mean differences across Greece and the Netherlands, International Journal of Business Science and Applied Management, 7, 2012, (2), 40-52.
  125. Xxx – Coronavirus – European Universities Initiative impact survey results, disponibil https://ec.europa.eu/programmes/erasmus-plus/resources/documents/ coronavirus -european- universities-initiative-impact-survey-results_en
  126. Xxx – YUFE- Young Universities for the future of Europe, disponibil https://www.yufe.eu/
  127. xxx International Society for Technology in Education. 2016. ISTE standards for students. Arlington, VA: International Society for Technology in Education.
  128. xxx International Society for Technology in Education. 2017. ISTE standards for educators. Arlington, VA: International Society for Technology in Education.
  129. xxx- Interviu Alexandra Mihai https://www.edupedu.ro/interviu-expert-in-educatia-digitala- despre-viitorul-an-academic-accentul-sa-fie-pe-pedagogie-nu-pe-aplicatii-si-instrumente- alexandra-mihai-vrije-universiteit-brussel/
  130. N. Harari, (martie, 2020) The world after coronavirus, disponibil https://www.ft.com/ content/19d90308-6858-11ea-a3c9-1fe6fedcca75
  131. N.Harari, (martie, 2020) The world after coronavirus, disponibil https://www.ft. com /content/19d90308-6858-11ea-a3c9-1fe6fedcca75
  132. Yusoff, R.B.M., Ali, A.M., Khan, A., Bakar, S.A., Psychometric evaluation of Utrecht Work Engagement Scale among academic staff in universities of Pakistan, World Applied Sciences Journal, 28(11), 2013, 1555-1560.
  133. Zecca, G., Györkös C., Becker J., Massoudi K., de Bruin G.P., Rossier J., Validation of the French Utrecht Work Engagement Scale and its relationship with personality traits and impulsivity, Revue Européenne de Psychologie Appliquée, 65 (1), 2015, 19-28.
  134. *** Decretul Presedintelui Romaniei nr. 195 din 16.03.2020 privind instituirea starii de urgenta pe teritoriul Romaniei;
  135. *** Decretul Presedintelui Romaniei nr. 240 din 14.04.2020 privind prelungirea starii de urgenta pe teritoriul Romaniei;
  136. *** Hotararea Guvernului nr. 24 din 14.05.2020 privind aprobarea instituirii starii de alerta la nivel national si a masurilor de prevenire si control a infectiilor, in contextul situatiei epidemiologice generate de virusul Sars-Cov2;
  137. *** Hotararea Guvernului nr. 476/2020, nr.5 53/2020, nr. 668/2020 privind prelungirea starii de alerta pe teritoriul Romaniei;
  138. *** Legea nr. 136 din 18.07.2020 privind instituirea unor masuri in domeniul sanatatii publice in situatii de risc epidemiologic si biologic;
  139. *** Legea nr. 258 din 23.04.2002 privind organizarea si functionarea Politiei Romane;
  140. *** Legea nr. 360 din 06.06.2002 privind Statutul politistului;
  141. *** Legea nr. 55 din 15.05.2020 privind unele masuri pentru prevenirea si combaterea efectelor pandemiei de Covid-19;
  142. *** Ordinul Ministrului Afacerilor Interne nr. 577 din 08.08.2008 privind programul de lucru al politistilor, formele de organizare a acestuia si acordarea repausului saptamanal;
  143. *** Ordonanta Militara a Ministrului Afacerilor Interne nr. 1-5 privind masuri de prevenire a raspandirii Covid-19;
  144. ***, DG AGRI, Evaluation of the CAP measures related to apiculture Agriculture and Rural Development, DG – Final Report, 2013.
  145. ***, Fisele masurilor PNDR 2014-2020, disponibile la: www.madr.ro
  146. ***, Hotararea nr. 1050/2013 pentru aprobarea Programului National Apicol pentru perioada 2014-2016, a normelor de aplicare, precum si a valorii sprijinului financiar.
  147. ***, Raportul APIA pentru anul 2018.
  148. ***, Raportul Asociatiei Crescatorilor de Albine (ACA) Hunedoara, martie 2019.
  149. ***, Raportul Comisiei catre Parlamentul European si Consiliu cu privire la punerea in aplicare a masurilor privind sectorul apicol prevazute de Regulamentul (CE) nr. 1234/2007 al Consiliului.
  150. ***, Raportul Federatiei ROMAPIS pe baza datelor publicate de Ministerul Agriculturii si Dezvoltarii Rurale si a consultarii tuturor organismelor de certificare si inspectie acreditate in Romania despre situatia sectorului apicol la 1 ianuarie 2019.
  151. ***, Regulamentul (CE) nr. 797/2004 al Consiliului din 26 aprilie 2004 privind actiunile de imbunatatire a conditiilor de productie si comercializare a produselor apicole.

Informații suplimentare


Abordari si studii de caz relevante privind managementul organizatiilor din Romania in contextul pandemiei COVID – 19










Nu există recenzii până acum.

Fii primul care adaugi o recenzie la „Abordari si studii de caz relevante privind managementul organizatiilor din Romania in contextul pandemiei COVID – 19”

Adresa ta de email nu va fi publicată. Câmpurile obligatorii sunt marcate cu *

Bucuresti, Bd-ul Iuliu Maniu (212) 862-3680 editura@prouniversitaria.ro